Vol 6No 02December 2025

La concentrada geografía legal de la propiedad privada rural en Chile: ¿una oportunidad para los VGGT?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53077/haal.v6i02.263
Vol 6No 02December 2025pp. 135-160
Keywords: 
  • Rural Property,
  • Land Concentration,
  • Climate Change,
  • Legal Geography,
  • VGGT

Abstract Views: 0 | Downloads: 0

PDF

Abstract

En este artículo investigo la trayectoria e intensidad de la concentración de la tierra en Chile en un contexto marcado por los efectos del cambio climático en las zonas rurales. En este sentido, ofrezco una perspectiva analítica que considera este fenómeno como una expresión geográfica del sistema de tenencia de la tierra, caracterizado por su vocación individual, absoluta y excluyente de la propiedad privada. En segundo lugar, para cuantificar su trayectoria, organizo sistemáticamente los datos recogidos en los Censos Agrarios realizados entre 1965 y 2021, revelando una presencia significativa del fenómeno tanto en las tierras de regadío como en las de secano situadas en las regiones con mayor potencial agrícola. A partir de lo anterior, argumento que las Directrices Voluntarias sobre la Gobernanza Responsable de la Tenencia (VGGT) tienen la capacidad de articular un diálogo para reconsiderar el contenido y los límites de la geografía legal de la propiedad rural en Chile, con el fin de fortalecer un sistema de tenencia capaz de ofrecer una alternativa coordinada y colaborativa a los efectos del cambio climático en las zonas rurales.

How to Cite

Villavicencio, E. (2025). La concentrada geografía legal de la propiedad privada rural en Chile: ¿una oportunidad para los VGGT?. Historia Agraria De América Latina, 6(02), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.53077/haal.v6i02.263

Copyright (c) 2025 Eduardo Villavicencio

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Anseeuw, W., Lay, J., Messerli, P., Giger, M., & Taylor, M. (2013). Creating a public tool to assess and promote transparency in global land deals: The experience of the Land Matrix. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.803071
  2. Babie, P. (2010a). Idea, Sovereignty, Eco-colonialism and the Future: Four Reflections on Private Property and Climate Change. Griffith Law Review, 19(3), 527–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2010.10854687
  3. Babie, P. (2010b). Private Property: The Solution or The Source of The Problem? Amsterdam Law Forum, 2(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.115
  4. Barraclough, S. L. (1973). Agrarian Structure in Latin America: A Resume of the CIDA Land Tenure Studies Of: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru. Lexington Books.
  5. Bauluz, L., Govind, Y., & Novokmet, F. (2020). Global Land Inequality. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03022360
  6. Bellisario, A. (2013). La reforma agraria chilena. Reformismo, socialismo y neoliberalismo, 1964-1980. Historia Agraria, 32.
  7. Bengoa, J. (2013). Rural Chile Transformed: Lights and Shadows: Rural Chile Transformed: Lights and Shadows. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12015
  8. Berbeka, T., & Neuvellon, J. (2020). Farm structure and land concentration – evidence from France. Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists, XXII(4), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.5960
  9. Blomley, N. (2004). The boundaries of property: Lessons from Beatrix Potter. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 48(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2004.00049.x
  10. Blomley, N. (2019). The territorialization of property in land: Space, power and practice. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1359107
  11. Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2013). Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘From Below’. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1723–1747. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843845
  12. Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2024). Land rush. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2317961
  13. Borras, S. M., Kay, C., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J. (2012). Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement, 33(4), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2012.745394
  14. Burger, A. (2001). Agricultural development and land concentration in a central European country: A case study of Hungary. Land Use Policy, 18(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00023-0
  15. Burja, V., Tamas-Szora, A., & Dobra, I. B. (2020). Land Concentration, Land Grabbing and Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Romania. Sustainability, 12(5), 2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052137
  16. Butler, L. L. (2022). Property, climate change, and accountability. In N. Graham, M. Davies, & L. Godden, The Routledge Handbook of Property, Law and Society (1st edn, pp. 287–296). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139614-28
  17. Cipollina, M., Cuffaro, N., & D’Agostino, G. (2018). Land Inequality and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 10(12), 4655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124655
  18. Cordero Quinzacara, E., & Aldunate Lizana, E. (2008). Evolución histórica del concepto de propiedad. Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos, 30. https://doi.org/10/fk2kf5
  19. Critchley, W., Harari, N., Mollee, E., Mekdaschi-Studer, R., & Eichenberger, J. (2023). Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change Adaptation for Small-Scale Land Users in Sub-Saharan Africa. Land, 12(6), 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061206
  20. de Soto, H. (2002). Law and Property Outside the West: A Few New Ideas about Fighting Poverty. Forum for Development Studies, 29(2), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2002.9666211
  21. Echenique, J. (2013). Dinámicas del mercado de la tierra en América Latina y el Caribe: Concentración y extranjerización (F. Soto Baquero & S. Gómez, Eds). FAO.
  22. FAO. (2012). Directrices voluntarias sobre la gobernanza responsable de la tenencia de la tierra, la pesca y los bosques en el contexto de la seguridad alimentaria nacional. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura.
  23. FAO. (2014). Reflexiones sobre la concentración y extranjerización de la tierra en América Latina y el Caribe. FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7bf39630-c52c-42dd-afaf-dcd32f6c813c/content
  24. FAO. (2024). The unjust climate – Measuring the impacts of climate change on rural poor, women and youth. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9680en
  25. Galor, O., & Moav, O. (2009). Inequality in Landownership, the Emergence of Human-Capital Promoting Institutions, and the Great Divergence. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00506.x
  26. Gerber, J.-D., Hartmann, T., & Hengstermann, A. (Eds). (2018). Instruments of Land Policy: Dealing with Scarcity of Land (First Edition). Routledge.
  27. Glass, J., Morran, R. M., & Thomson, S. (n.d.). Report prepared for Scottish Land Commission.
  28. Gomez, S., & Echenique, J. (1991). La agricultura chilena, las dos caras de la modernización. (Tercera). FLACSO.
  29. González, F., Gallego, F., Marshall, G., G. Díaz, J., & I. Cuesta, J. (2017). La reforma agraria chilena: Hechos estilizados a la luz de una nueva base de datos. Estudios Públicos, 146. https://doi.org/10/gssvtx
  30. González U, J., & Velasco H, R. (2008). Evaluation of the Impact of Climatic Change on the Economic Value of Land in Agricultural Systems in Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392008000100006
  31. Graham, N. (2011). Lawscape: Property, environment, law. Routledge.
  32. Graham, N. (2012). Dephysicalisation and entitlement: Legal and cultural discourses of place as property. In B. Jessup & K. Rubenstein (Eds), Environmental Discourses in Public and International Law (1st edn, pp. 96–120). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094610.008
  33. Graham, N. (2020). Dephysicalised Property and Shadow Lands. In R. Bartel (Ed.), Graham, Nicole G., Dephysicalised Property and Shadow Lands (December 18, 2019). N. Graham, ‘Dephysicalised Property and Shadow Lands’ in R. Bartel and J. Carter (Eds) “Handbook on Law, Space and Place”, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2020 (Forthcoming), Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 19/83, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3505790. Edward Elgar Publishing. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3505790
  34. Guereña, A. (2016). Desterrados: Tierra, poder y desigualdad en América Latina (p. 99). OXFAM.
  35. Gwynne, R. N., & Kay, C. (1997). Agrarian Change and the Democratic Transition in Chile: An Introduction. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 16(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.1997.tb00155.x
  36. IFAD. (2019). Creating opportunities for rural youth (Rural Development Report). International Fund for Agricultural Development.
  37. Ilc, & Oxfam. (2020). Unever Ground. La desigualdad de la tierra en el corazón de las sociedades desiguales.
  38. INE. (2007). Cambios Estructurales en la Agricultura Chilena. Análisis Intercensal 1976—1997—2007. Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
  39. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. (2022). Climate Change and Land: IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (1st edn). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988
  40. IPES-Food. (2024). Land Squeeze: What is driving unprecedented pressures on global farmland and what can be done to achieve equitable access to land?
  41. Jansen, K. (2015). The debate on food sovereignty theory: Agrarian capitalism, dispossession and agroecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(1), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.945166
  42. Jansen, L. J. M., & Kalas, P. P. (2020). Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: A Conceptual Basis to Analyze Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Multi-Stakeholder Transformative Governance Illustrated with an Example from South Africa. Sustainability, 12(23), 9901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239901
  43. Jefferies, A. (1971). Agrarian Reform in Chile. Geographical Association, 56(3), 221–230.
  44. Kalfas, D., Kalogiannidis, S., Papaevangelou, O., & Chatzitheodoridis, F. (2024). Assessing the Connection between Land Use Planning, Water Resources, and Global Climate Change. Water, 16(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020333
  45. Kay, C. (1975). Agrarian reform and the transition to socialism in Chile, 1970–1973. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2(4), 418–445. https://doi.org/10/d8427s
  46. Kay, C. (1977). Types of agrarian reform and their contradictions: The case of Chile. Sociologia Ruralis, 17(1), 203–222. https://doi.org/10/cp8rrn
  47. Kay, C. (1980). Política Económica, Alianza de Clases y Cambios Agrarios en Chile. Economia, 3(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10/gssvvm
  48. Kay, C. (1981). La Política Agraria Del Gobierno Militar De Chile. El Trimestre Económico, 48(191(3)), 567–601.
  49. Kay, C. (1996). The Agrarian Question in Chile since the Democratic Transition.
  50. Leal Filho, W., Stojanov, R., Wolf, F., Matandirotya, N. R., Ploberger, C., Ayal, D. Y., Azam, F. M. S., AL-Ahdal, T. M. A., Sarku, R., Tchouaffe Tchiadje, N. F., Manolas, E., & Li, C. (2022). Assessing Uncertainties in Climate Change Adaptation and Land Management. Land, 11(12), 2226. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122226
  51. Ley de Reforma Agraria, Pub. L. No. 16.640 (1967). https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=28596&idParte=&idVersion=1989-01-07
  52. Ley Sobre Recuperación Del Bosque Nativo y Fomento Forestal., Pub. L. No. LEY SOBRE RECUPERACIÓN DEL BOSQUE NATIVO Y FOMENTO FORESTAL (2008).
  53. Locke, A., & Henley, G. (2013). The Possible Shape of a Land Transparency Initiative (Shaping Policy for Development, p. 76).
  54. McBride, G. M. (1930). The Agrarian Problem in Chile. Geographical Review, 20(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10/dpxsvt
  55. Mejías, W. (2025). Análisis de la concentración de la tierra con uso silvoagropecuario en Chile. Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias. https://bibliotecadigital.odepa.gob.cl/bitstream/handle/20.500.12650/73846/Art_AnalisisConcentraci%c3%b3nTierraUsoSilvoagropecuarioChile.pdf
  56. Melo, O., & Foster, W. (2021). Agricultural and Forestry Land and Labor Use under Long-Term Climate Change in Chile. Atmosphere, 12(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12030305
  57. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia. (2017). Encuesta CASEN.
  58. Moreno, R. (2014). Sin Reforma Agraria no habría sido posible: Memorias de la Reforma Agraria chilena 1958-1970. Ediciones Copygraph. http://www.memoriachilena.gob.cl/602/w3-article-341612.html
  59. Murray, W. E. (2006). Neo-feudalism in Latin America? Globalisation, agribusiness, and land re-concentration in Chile. Journal of Peasant Studies, 33(4), 646–677. https://doi.org/10/ccjb3b
  60. Nedelsky, J. (2022). A relational approach to property. In N. Graham, M. Davies, & L. Godden, The Routledge Handbook of Property, Law and Society (1st edn, pp. 325–336). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139614-31
  61. Novoa, E. (1982). Una evolución inadvertida: El derecho de propiedad. Revista Mensaje, 31(306), 26–31.
  62. Novoa, E. (1989). El derecho de propiedad privada: Concepto, evolución y crítica. (2 Edición). Centro de Estudios Políticos Latinoamericanos.
  63. ODEPA. (2019). Panorama de la agricultura chilena—2019 / Chilean agriculture overview. ODEPA.
  64. ODEPA. (2023). Evaluación de los efectos adversos del cambio climático y riesgos actuales y proyectados para el sector silvoagropecuario en el marco del plan de adaptación nacional al cambio climático del sector silvoagropecuario (PANCC SAP) 2023-2027.
  65. Palšová, L., Bandlerová, A., & Machničová, Z. (2021). Land Concentration and Land Grabbing Processes—Evidence from Slovakia. Land, 10(8), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080873
  66. Piet, L., Latruffe, L., Le Mouel, C., & Desjeux, Y. (2012). How do agricultural policies influence farm size inequality? The example of France. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr035
  67. Plogmann, J., Mußhoff, O., Odening, M., & Ritter, M. (2022). Farm growth and land concentration. Land Use Policy, 115, 106036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106036
  68. Popovici, E.-A., Mitrică, B., & Mocanu, I. (2018). Land concentration and land grabbing: Implications for the socio-economic development of rural communities in south-eastern Romania. Outlook on Agriculture, 47(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727018781138
  69. Rasva, M., & Jürgenson, E. (2022). Agricultural Land Concentration in Estonia and Its Containment Possibilities. Land, 11(12), 2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122270
  70. Roberts, M. J., & Key, N. (2008). Agricultural Payments and Land Concentration: A Semiparametric Spatial Regression Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(3), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01144.x
  71. Seufert, P. (2013). The FAO Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests. Globalizations, 10(1), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.764157
  72. Shields, K. (2022). A Review of Evidence on Land Acquisition Powers and Land Ownership Restrictions in European Countries (Agriculture, Enviroment and Marine). Scotish Goverment. https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/research-and-analysis/2022/12/review-evidence-land-acquisition-powers-land-ownership-restrictions-european-countries/documents/review-evidence-land-acquisition-powers-land-ownership-restrictions-european-countries/review-evidence-land-acquisition-powers-land-ownership-restrictions-european-countries/govscot%3Adocument/review-evidence-land-acquisition-powers-land-ownership-restrictions-european-countries.pdf
  73. Silva, P. (1987). Estado, neoliberalismo y política agraria en Chile, 1973-1981. CEDLA ; Distribuido por Foris Publications.
  74. Sobrino-García, I. (2023). How Can the Adoption of the Voluntary Guidelines Improve Public Policy and Women’s Access to Agricultural Land in Mexico, Guatemala, and Bolivia? Laws, 12(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12030044
  75. Soto Baquero, F., & Gómez, S. (Eds). (2013). Dinámicas del mercado de la tierra en América Latina y el Caribe: Concentración y extranjerización. FAO.
  76. Soto, H. D. (2001). The Mystery Of Capital. Black Swan.
  77. Stessa Chao, T. (2018). A Taiwan perspective on reference land values: The hare and the hedgehogs – chasing real price levels with public market information. In J.-D. Gerber, T. Hartmann, & A. Hengstermann (Eds), Instruments of Land Policy: Dealing with Scarcity of Land (First Edition). Routledge.
  78. Torres, R., Azócar, G., Rojas, J., Montecinos, A., & Paredes, P. (2015). Vulnerability and resistance to neoliberal environmental changes: An assessment of agriculture and forestry in the Biobio region of Chile (1974–2014). Geoforum, 60, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.013
  79. Tramel, S. (2019). The Tenure Guidelines in Policy and Practice: Democratizing Land Control in Guatemala. Land, 8(11), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8110168
  80. Valdes, A., & Foster, W. (2014). The Agrarian Reform Experiment in Chile: History, Impact, and Implications. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10/gssvtq
  81. Valdés, A., & Foster, W. (2015). La reforma agraria en Chile (1st edn). Ediciones UC; JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1bhkq43
  82. Valdes, A., & Foster, W. (2018). Agricultural and Rural Policies in Chile (pp. 291–308). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813226463_0013
  83. Vargas, D., & Luiselli, C. (2020). Methodological considerations on land inequality. International Land Coalition. https://d3o3cb4w253x5q.cloudfront.net/media/documents/2021_3_land_inequality_data_paper_methodological_considerations_low_res.pdf
  84. Villavicencio-Pinto, E. (2020). Estrategias de acaparamiento en Chile. Una mirada desde la concentración de la propiedad rural analizando algunos casos de Land Matrix. (No. 2; Dossier). Fundapaz.
  85. Villela, H. (1979). Autoritarismo y tenencia de la tierra: Chile 1973-1976. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 41(1), 205–241. https://doi.org/10/fpxns8
  86. Villela, H. (2019). Saqueo y exterminio de la clase campesina chilena: La contra reforma agraria del régimen civil y militar, 1973-1976 (1a. ed.). LOM Ediciones.
  87. Vollrath, D. (2006). Geography and the Determinants of Land Distribution: Evidence from the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.938010
  88. Vollrath, D. (2021). Land Distribution and International Agricultural Productivity. 16.
  89. Voß, W., & Bannert, J. (2018). Reference land values in Germany. In J.-D. Gerber, T. Hartmann, & A. Hengstermann (Eds), Instruments of Land Policy: Dealing with Scarcity of Land (First Edition). Routledge.